With this post I wanted to compare and contrast two views, or perceptions, of Christian truth.

Perception one views God’s truth as narrower, with their personal truth and belief lining-up closely with God’s truth; thus “orthodox”. To the varying degrees that everyone else’s beliefs stray from “orthodox” belief, the closer they get to unorthodoxy (heresy) and the further from God they go.

Perception two views God’s truth as wider, so wide in fact that no one human or group can claim absolute “correct” belief. They believe that all Christian beliefs have some things that line up with God’s truth and other things that do not. In a sense, we are all right and wrong in our understanding of God, no one is “orthodox”—and never will be while on earth.

But, as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. So here are 4 sets of diagrams I created (I am a visual person) that compare and contrast these two perceptions. These are overly simplified and cannot represent the entirety of all the perceptions of truth. I just feel these two are rather predominant in today’s modern/postmodern world. Here are the four sets:

line-of-truth_a.jpg
A linear example. The perception is that our personal truths and beliefs line up closely with God’s. Everyone else falls within the spectrum of orthodoxy and heresy, depending how far they veer from the truth as we perceive it to be.
—————————————————————————————————————
line-of-truth_b.jpg
This perception says that all Christian understandings of God are on the same plain and all share correct and incorrect belief about God. Each belief is different, but each still shares truth one degree or another. Here, orthodoxy and heresy are shared by all.

____________________________________________________

circle-of-truth_a.jpg
An elliptical example. Basically the same as the previous, just not a linear model.
—————————————————————————————————————
circle-of-truth_b.jpg
Here, God’s truth is perceived as very big and incomprehensible for humans. All of our Christian understanding is but on the very edges of God’s truth, just scratching the surface. Here again, we all share correct belief and error to varying degrees.
____________________________________________________
tree-of-truth_a.jpg
An organic example. We perceive God’s truth (tree) and our truth/belief as basically the same; they’re different colors, but the same type of tree and overlap. Everyone else’s truth/belief, though they are still trees, are not quite in line with God’s truth. Our tree is truth.
—————————————————————————————————————
tree-of-truth_b.jpg
Here, the perception is we are all apart of the same tree and all represent God’s truth to one degree or another. We are simply different branches of the same tree, not different trees. Each branch is different but are still maintained by, and can in relationship with each other because of, a shared trunk.
_____________________________________________________
window-of-truth_a.jpg
A window example. We all have our particular windows from which we see God. Here, the perception is that God’s truth exists through one window, the one we see God through. Again, the further from our “orthodox” window others view things, the closer they approach heresy.
—————————————————————————————————————
window-of-truth_b.jpg
Here, the perception is that God’s truth is all encompassing and that each window views a narrow aspect of it. That the view from all the windows combined present a clearer, though not absolute, picture of God’s truth. The whole is indeed greater than the parts.

These sets of diagrams really help me understand the differences in modern and postmodern thought about truth. It helps me understand why a person who views truth through the first perception does not understand someone viewing truth through the second perception, and visa-versa. It helps me see that these two differing perceptions makes communication about truth/God very difficult at times when one person adheres to one perception and one person, another. So these help me. I hope they also help you.